Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1994
Title I, Subchapter XII-J of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3796 ii et. seq. authorizes the Attorney General to make grants to States, State courts, local courts, units of local government, and Indian tribal governments to establish drug courts in response to increased numbers of nonviolent, substance-abusing adult and juvenile offenders who contribute to the pervasive problems of prison and jail overcrowding and the high recidivism rate of those offenders.
Arkansas Drug Court Act
This act discusses the establishment and implementation of drug courts in Arkansas, eligibility requirements for the program, and evaluation measures of the drug court programs.
California Comprehensive Drug Court Implementation Act of 1999
This act provides funding to drug courts, including those for (1) juvenile offenders; (2) parents of children who are detained by or dependents of the juvenile court; (3) parents of children in family law cases involving custody and visitation issues; (4) criminal offenders; and (5) other drug court systems approved by the Drug Court Partnership Executive Steering Committee.
Florida House Bill 175
This bill authorizes a court to order individuals involved in a dependency case to be evaluated for drug or alcohol problems, and allows the court, after a finding of dependency, to require an individual to participate in and comply with treatment-based drug court programs.
Florida House Bill 199
This bill, relating to substance abuse treatment programs, provides criteria, goals, and principals for operating treatment-based drug court programs.
Idaho Drug Court and Mental Health Court Act
This act discusses the establishment and implementation of drug courts in Idaho, eligibility requirements for the program, and evaluation measures of the drug court programs.
Idaho Senate Bill No. 1171
An act relating to drug courts to provide a statement of policy, establishment, eligibility requirements, evaluation, and implementation of funding for drug courts in Idaho.
Missouri House Bill 1403
This bill establishes the Drug Courts Coordinating Commission to coordinate the allocation of resources to drug courts throughout the state.
Missouri House Bill 1633
This bill authorizes each circuit court to establish drug courts that may dispose of alcohol and drug related cases.
North Dakota House Bill 1191
This bill will make permanent an innovative pilot program that combines courts, corrections and treatment services to lower the repeat rate of drug offenders and put them on the road to recovery. The program, which applies to offenders sentenced for driving while under the influence, was scheduled to expire on July 31, 2003.
Oregon House Bill 3363
This bill relates to drug court programs in Oregon and the declaring of an emergency.
Texas House Bill 1287
This bill relates to the establishment of drug court programs in Texas.
Utah House Bill 281
This bill was passed by the 2000 Utah State Legislature and defines new policies in regard to how drug courts will operate in Utah.
Wyoming House Bill No. HB0205
An act relating to authorizing drug courts to impose extended periods of probation, requiring notice to eligible participants, and providing for an effective date for drug courts.
Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2003, Part 5
Part 5 of this Act provides for a court to be designated a drugs court and confers certain powers upon a judge when sitting as a drugs court.
New South Wales, Australia Drug Court Amendment Act 2002 No 93
This act amends the Drug Court Act 1998, making further provisions with respect to participation in drug programs, the termination of drug programs, sentencing and the accommodation of participants.
Links from the NCJRS Web site to non-Federal sites do not constitute an endorsement by
NCJRS or its sponsors. NCJRS is not responsible for the content or privacy policy of any
off-site pages that are referenced, nor does NCJRS guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness,
or correct sequencing of information. NCJRS is also not responsible for the use of, or results
obtained from the use of, the information. It is the responsibility of the user to evaluate the
content and usefulness of information obtained from non-Federal sites.