skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 176347     Find in a Library
Title: Family Group Conferencing: Implications for Crime Victims
Corporate Author: University of Minnesota
Ctr for Restorative Justice & Mediation
School of Social Work
United States of America
Project Director: Mark S. Umbreit Ph.D.
Date Published: 04/2000
Page Count: 19
Sponsoring Agency: Office for Victims of Crime
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 96-VF-GX-K006
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

OVC Resource Ctr
P.O. Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: HTML Text PDF PDF 
Type: Program/Project Description
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report discusses the implications of family group conferencing (FGC) for crime victims, based on the use of family conferencing in New Zealand, Australia, Canada, and the United States.
Abstract: During the past several years, FGC models used in New Zealand and Australia have received considerable attention in the United States and Canada. FGC involves persons most affected by crime--the victim, the offender, and family and friends of both the victim and the offender. In FGC, the facilitator contacts the victim and the offender to explain the process and invite them to the conference. The facilitator also asks the victim and the offender to identify key members of their support systems who will be invited to participate as well. The history of FGC is reviewed, and similarities and differences between FGC and victim-offender mediation are noted. Potential dangers of the FGC model are identified, such as inadequate preparation, victim insensitivity and coercion, feelings of young offenders about being intimidated by adults, lack of neutrality, and inflexibility and assumed cultural neutrality of the FGC process. Guidelines for restorative FGC are offered. 27 references and 1 table
Main Term(s): Victims of Crime
Index Term(s): Mediation ; Victim-offender relationships ; Alternative dispute settlement ; Family intervention programs ; US/foreign comparisons ; Foreign criminal justice systems ; Victim-offender reconciliation ; Victims in foreign countries ; Family conferencing ; Canada ; New Zealand ; Australia ; United States of America
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=176347

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.