skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 238993   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Test Results for Mobile Device Acquisition Tool: CelleBrite UFED 1.1.8.6 - Report Manager 1.8.3 UFED Physical Analyzer 2.3.0
Corporate Author: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
United States of America
Date Published: 09/2012
Page Count: 210
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2003-IJ-R-029
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Test/Measurement
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This document reports the results from testing CelleBrite’s UFED, version 1.1.8.6 against the Smart Phone Tool Text Assertions and Test Plan.
Abstract: Test results provide the information needed for developers to improve tools, users to make informed choices, and the legal community and others to understand the tools’ capabilities. The CelleBrite Universal Forensic Extraction Device (UFED) is designed for logical and physical acquisitions; data analysis; and report management from mobile phones, Smart Phones, Subscriber Identity Modules (SIMs), and Global Positioning System devices. The tool was tested for its ability to acquire active and deleted data from the internal memory of mobile devices and SIMs. Except for the following anomalies, the tool acquired all supported data objects completely and accurately for all nine mobile devices tested. The anomalies found pertain to personal information management (PIM) data, MMS messages, call logs, subscriber and equipment-related information, address book entries that contain non-ASCII characters, and device acquisition disruption. The remaining sections of the report describe how the tests were conducted, discuss any anomalies that were encountered, and provide documentation of test-case run details that support the report summary. Another section presents justification for the selection of test cases from the set of possible cases defined in the test plan for smart phone forensic tools. Generally, the test cases are selected based on features offered by the tool. Hardware and software used to run the test cases are listed. The concluding section of the report describes each test-case run. The description of each test run lists all test assertions used in the test case, the expected result, and the actual result. Extensive tables
Main Term(s): Police equipment
Index Term(s): Computer aided operations ; Evidence collection ; Evidence identification and analysis ; Computer hardware systems ; Computer related crime ; Computer evidence ; NIJ grant-related documents
Note: NIJ Special Report
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=261050

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.