skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 145328   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Sentencing in the Federal Courts: Does Race Matter? The Transition to Sentencing Guidelines, 1986-90
Author(s): D C McDonald ; K E Carlson
Corporate Author: Abt Associates, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 240
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Statistics
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 91-BJ-CX-K025
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Agency Summary: Agency Summary 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examines racial and ethnic disparities in sentences imposed on Federal offenders before and after implementation of the sentencing guidelines authorized by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and the mandatory minimum imprisonment provisions of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986.
Abstract: Patterns in sentences for whites, blacks, and Hispanics were analyzed by controlling for explanatory variables that may correlate with race or ethnicity and by simulating the sentences that would have been imposed under alternative sentencing schemes. The study found that during 1986-88, before full implementation of Federal sentencing guidelines, white, black, and Hispanic offenders received similar sentences, on average, in Federal district courts. Among Federal offenders sentenced under guidelines from January 20, 1989 to June 30, 1990, there were substantial aggregate differences in sentences imposed on white, black, and Hispanic offenders. Nearly all of the aggregate differences among sentences for whites, blacks, and Hispanics during this period can be attributed to characteristics of offenses and offenders that current law and sentencing guidelines establish as legitimate considerations in sentencing decisions. Some characteristics of offenses or offenders that correlate with race or ethnicity strongly influence sentences under current Federal law and sentencing guidelines. The main reason that blacks' sentences were longer than whites' from January 1989 to June 1990 was that 83 percent of all Federal offenders convicted of trafficking in crack cocaine in guideline cases were black, and the average sentence imposed for crack trafficking was twice as long as for trafficking in powdered cocaine. A 53-item bibliography
Main Term(s): Court statistics
Index Term(s): Sentencing disparity ; Sentencing guidelines ; Racial discrimination ; Courts
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=145328

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.