skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 175715     Find in a Library
Title: Reintegration, Supervised Release, and Intensive Aftercare
Author(s): David M. Altschuler ; Troy L. Armstrong ; Doris Layton MacKenzie
Date Published: 07/1999
Page Count: 24
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
Grant Number: 87-JS-CX-K094; 95-MU-MU-K016
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
P.O. Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: HTML PDF 
Type: Program Description (Model)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The authors distinguish the Intensive Aftercare Program (IAP) model from other models and programs that have been implemented and assessed with varying degrees of success and analyze individual IAP initiatives.
Abstract: While other aftercare evaluations have not all been experimental in design, the IAP evaluation uses experimental methodology to gauge the success of four projects supported by the Office of Juvenile Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) in their implementation of the IAP model. Aftercare initiatives, including the IAP model, are examined in light of a University of Maryland report on the effectiveness of various crime prevention strategies. Recent juvenile aftercare initiatives in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Michigan are briefly described. The OJJDP's IAP approach is examined, with mention of pilot programs in Colorado, Nevada, New Jersey, and Virginia. A comparative analysis of aftercare projects is presented in a matrix, and the effectiveness of aftercare programs is discussed with respect to juvenile rehabilitation and treatment. The authors conclude effective aftercare programs must include rehabilitation and services to address the needs of individual juveniles. 71 references, 5 tables, and 1 figure
Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency prevention programs
Index Term(s): Program evaluation ; Comparative analysis ; Model programs ; Juvenile aftercare/parole statistics ; Juvenile rehabilitation ; Juvenile crime control ; OJJDP grant-related documents ; Maryland ; Michigan ; Nevada ; New Jersey ; Pennsylvania ; Virginia ; Colorado
Note: OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=175715

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.