skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 181465     Find in a Library
Title: Measurement of Police Integrity, Research in Brief
Series: NIJ Research in Brief
Author(s): Carl B. Klockars ; Sanja K. Ivkovich ; William E. Harver ; Maria R. Haberfeld
Date Published: 05/2000
Page Count: 11
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

US Department of Justice
United States of America
Grant Number: 95-IJ-CX-0058
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: Text PDF 
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Survey
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Following an overview of research pertinent to police officers' understanding of agency rules concerning police misconduct and the extent of their support for these rules, this paper reports on a survey that solicited information in key areas that form the foundation of an occupational/organizational culture theory of police integrity.
Abstract: The survey sample consisted of 3,235 officers from 30 U.S. police agencies from across the Nation. The survey asked officers for their opinions about various hypothetical cases of police misconduct, thereby avoiding the resistance that direct inquiries about corrupt behavior would likely provoke. The survey measured how seriously officers regarded police corruption, how willing they were to report it, and how willing they were to support punishment for rules violations by fellow officers. Based on officers' responses to questions on 11 hypothetical case scenarios of police corrupt behavior, the study found that officers considered some types of misconduct to be significantly less serious than others. The more serious the officers perceived a behavior to be, the more likely they were to believe that more severe discipline was appropriate and the more willing they were to report a colleague who engaged in the misconduct. A majority of officers said they would not report a fellow officer who had engaged in what they regarded as less serious misconduct (e.g., operating an off-duty security business; accepting free gifts, meals, and discounts; or having a minor accident while driving under the influence of alcohol). Most officers indicated they would report a colleague who stole from a found wallet or a burglary scene, accepted a bribe or kickback, or used excessive force on a car thief after a foot pursuit. The survey found substantial differences in the environment of integrity among the 30 agencies in the sample. 7 exhibits and 6 notes
Main Term(s): Police misconduct
Index Term(s): Testing and measurement ; Police corruption ; Police attitudes ; Professional conduct and ethics ; Police subculture ; Police discipline
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=181465

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.