skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 186480     Find in a Library
Title: Sentencing Guidelines: Reflections on the Future, Research in Brief
Series: NIJ Research in Brief
Author(s): Robin L. Lubitz ; Thomas W. Ross
Date Published: 06/2001
Page Count: 7
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
Corrections Program Office
United States of America
Grant Number: 97-MUMU-K006
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: Text PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper discussed the future of the sentencing guidelines movement and its adaptability to inevitable changes in criminal justice policy.
Abstract: America’s experiment with sentencing guidelines has survived more than a quarter century. They began locally and expanded to State and Federal levels. The ideological neutrality of guidelines constituted their strength and staying power. Yet, their success or failure was judged by the goals a jurisdiction had set for its guidelines, which varied considerably. This paper examined the question of whether the sentencing guidelines movement would grow stronger or weaker as the 21st Century began and changes in criminal justice policy inevitably occurred. Sentencing guidelines have been an effective means of establishing sentencing policies and reflect many varied sentencing philosophies. The guideline systems are defined and based on a set of core principles: proportionality, consistency/uniformity, and rationality/transparency in sentencing. These principles seem to be at odds with new concepts of sentencing and corrections, specifically restorative justice. Restorative justice promotes reparation over retribution. The paper discussed the potential incompatibility of restorative justice and sentencing guidelines as either a perception or as a reality. On a philosophical core, restorative justice appears incompatible with guidelines, but when it comes to practical application there is the ability to incorporate elements of restorative justice into sentencing guidelines. Summarizing the future of sentencing guidelines, the most compelling reasons to expect that they will continue to be widely accepted and applied are their adaptability and ideological neutrality. It is of critical importance that the internal integrity of the sentencing guidelines remain intact.
Main Term(s): Sentencing guidelines
Index Term(s): Sentencing/Sanctions ; Victim-offender reconciliation
Note: NIJ Sentencing and Corrections, Issues for the 21st Century, No. 10
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=186480

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.