skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 187859     Find in a Library
Title: Multi-Site Evaluation of Sentencing Guidelines: Florida and North Carolina
Author(s): Linda Truitt Ph.D. ; William M. Rhodes Ph.D. ; Ryan N. Kling ; Quentin E. McMullen
Corporate Author: Abt Associates, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: 02/2000
Page Count: 95
Grant Number: 96-CE-VX-0016
Sale Source: Abt Associates, Inc
55 Wheeler Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This is a study of a multi-site evaluation of sentencing guidelines in Florida and North Carolina.
Abstract: The study observes the effects of sentencing guidelines and prison release policy changes on felony sentences and time served in Florida and North Carolina. Data for the study were collected by State court and corrections agencies for the period surrounding these policy changes, 1991 through 1997. In Florida, proportion of time served increased with each set of guidelines and associated release policy changes. Although admissions declined, demand on prison resources remained steady for serious inmates such as burglary and robbery offenders as time served increased commensurate with guidelines and release policies changes. Nonetheless, sentencing guidelines changes have a positive impact that is independent of the effects of admissions and release policies. Simulating future demand, the study finds that sentencing policies may double the number of prison beds required for such serious offenses by FY2013. In North Carolina, despite the increase for serious felonies effective with the 1995 guidelines, interrupted time-series indicate no change in primary offense charging patterns. Missing data probably attributable to record consolidation practices precludes definitive conclusions, but changes in prior record charging are not apparent. Also, there was no change in the proportion of cases for which active punishment was the presumed sentence that can be associated with guideline modifications in 1995. Notes, tables, figures, appendixes
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Data collection ; Sentencing guidelines ; Prison population prediction ; Sentencing reform ; Corrections ; Corrections policies ; Release level ; Florida ; North Carolina
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=187859

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.