skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 194004     Find in a Library
Title: Follow-The-Money Methods in Crime Control Policy
Author(s): R. T. Naylor
Date Published: 12/1999
Page Count: 57
Sale Source: Nathanson Centre for the Study of Organized Crime and Corruption
Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
Document: HTML 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: Canada
Annotation: This study examined money laundering and the role of asset forfeiture in crime control policies in the United States, Great Britain, Canada, and other countries.
Abstract: Crime control during the last 15 years has focused on the flows of criminal profits rather than on simply closing rackets that generate illegal income. The criminal and civil legal instruments focus on money laundering and asset seizure. The proceeds-of-crime approach has greatly expanded over the years. Supporters of these laws argue that they deter crime, prevent criminals from infiltrating and corrupting the legitimate economy, remove the capital essential for committing future crimes, and uphold the moral principle that no one should profit from their crimes. However, the justifications for these rationales are questionable. Reliable data on illegal activities and their proceeds are not available. Data from informants, cases, and sting operations are problematic. These problems apply both to the primary markets for illegal goods and services and also to the secondary market in laundering services. The seven major flaws in the proceeds-of-crime approach include the criminalization of matters formerly regarded as regulatory offenses, the elimination of the traditional right to financial privacy, erosion of due process, grossly disproportionate penalties, the threat to the integrity of the tax system, the skewing of law enforcement priorities in pernicious directions, and overt corruption of law enforcement. While Western countries have criminalized actions that generate illegal money and have criminalized its subsequent management, other countries have chosen to use the criminal law for individuals and financial policy initiatives for their wealth. The lack of proof of the effectiveness of the proceeds-of-crime approach in the West suggests the desirability of considering using the tax law instead of the current approaches. Alternative approaches would be more efficient and would avoid the current moral and human costs. Charts and reference notes
Main Term(s): Crime control policies
Index Term(s): Criminal infiltration of business ; Organized crime investigation ; Police corruption ; Forfeiture ; Organized crime prevention ; Deterrence effectiveness ; Forfeiture law ; Money laundering ; US/foreign comparisons ; Legislative impact ; Canada ; United Kingdom ; United States of America
Note: Provided to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service as a courtesy by Dr. Margaret Beare, Director of the Nathanson Centre for the Study of Organized Crime and Corruption at York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. http://www.yorku.ca/nathanson
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=194004

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.