skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 196673     Find in a Library
Title: Quality-of-Life Policing: Do Offenders Get the Message?
Series: NIJ Research Report
Author(s): Bruce D. Johnson ; Andrew Golub ; Angela Taylor ; John Eterno
Corporate Author: National Development and Research Institute, Inc. (NDRI)
United States of America
Date Published: 06/2002
Page Count: 31
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

National Institute on Drug Abuse
United States of America

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS)
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
Grant Number: 2000-IJ-CX-0041; 98-8252-NY-IJ;2000-7353-NY-IJ; 5T32DA07233-17
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

National Development and Research Institute, Inc. (NDRI)
71 West 23rd Street
New York, NY 10010
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The "fixing broken windows" theory argues that visible disorder in a community breeds crime; this study assessed one aspect of the "broken windows" line of reasoning, i.e., that quality-of-life (QOL) policing, which emphasizes the control of minor misbehaviors that are highly visible, sends a message to offenders that QOL misbehaviors will not be tolerated.
Abstract: In the 1990's, the New York City Police Department increased patrols and the enforcement of laws against QOL offenses. Targeted offenses included fare-beating, aggressive panhandling, graffiti writing, and sleeping on public benches. In the past, police would have tended to ignore these minor offenses or use a mild intervention. Beginning in the mid-1990's the police targeted these QOL behaviors for arrest. In order to test the deterrence effectiveness of such a policy, this study interviewed 539 arrestees in 1999. All of the study participants were asked a series of questions on QOL offending, regardless of whether or not they had been arrested for QOL violations. They were asked whether they perceived that police were targeting the behavior for warnings, tickets, or arrest; whether they had engaged in the behavior during the past year; if so, whether they had reduced or stopped such behavior during the previous 6 months; and if so, the reason for the reduction in the behavior. The study found that almost all of the arrestees were aware that police were targeting various QOL offenses for arrest. Among those active in the specified QOL misbehaviors, about half reported that they had severely cut back or stopped their involvement in the behaviors in the past 6 months; approximately half had not. Those who reduced their proscribed QOL behaviors cited general police presence as the most important factor, suggesting that for them QOL policing was effective as a general deterrent. 6 tables and 44 references
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Misdemeanor ; Disorderly conduct ; Deterrence effectiveness ; Community policing ; NIJ grant-related documents ; New York
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=196673

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.