skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 197040     Find in a Library
Title: Fighting Urban Crime: The Evolution of Federal-Local Collaboration, Research in Brief
Series: NIJ Research in Brief
Corporate Author: Abt Associates, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: 12/2003
Page Count: 19
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: OJP-99-C-008
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: Text PDF 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This document examines how Federal collaboration with local law enforcement authorities has evolved during 20 years of joint crime fighting against drugs, illegal weapons, and gangs.
Abstract: This study also examined particular collaborations in three cities: San Diego (California), Detroit (Michigan), and Memphis (Tennessee). Until the 1980's, long-term operational collaboration between local law enforcement and Federal authorities was quite rare. Federal and local authorities generally operate under formal agreements or negotiated procedures, share some operational leadership, consult frequently on jurisdiction, and coordinate on objectives. Most federally led collaborations involve long-term investigations of criminal organizations. Prosecution under Federal criminal statutes offers several powerful advantages: Federal grand jury, immunity, search warrants, preventive detention, electronic surveillance, witness protection, accomplice testimony, and discovery. Although collaboration has probably increased the number of Federal drug, firearms, and gang prosecutions, the magnitude of this increase is difficult to determine because aggregate statistics on Federal prosecutions do not track whether a case was developed through collaborative work. The impact of collaboration on urban communities is hard to ascertain because of how difficult it is to link changes in crime to specific law enforcement activities. Researchers found that collaborations have had considerable success, particularly against gangs. Collaborative work led to the disruption or breakup of several long-entrenched gangs in the three cities studied. Reductions in violent crime have been attributed partly to aggressive firearms prosecutions by task forces. The use of Federal firearms charges in prosecuting particularly dangerous individuals and gangs encouraged the criminal community to keep guns off the street. Interjurisdictional collaboration appears to have promoted better problem solving and intelligence sharing, as well as improved officer safety. It has permitted specialization against particular targets and increased funding to pay for informants, evidence, and overtime. Federal-local law enforcement collaborations usually have high-level agency commitment and sustained funding; clear ultimate legal authority; joint Federal-local leadership; and co-location of Federal and local law enforcement personnel promoting loyalty and teamwork. 5 notes
Main Term(s): Federal law enforcement agencies ; Interagency cooperation
Index Term(s): Police agencies ; Federal government ; Integrative agreements ; Case management ; Multi-Jurisdictional Task Forces ; Services integration
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=197040

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.