skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Celebrates National Library Week April 12-18

National Library Week

Started in 1958, National Library Week is a nationwide observance celebrated by all types of libraries - including the NCJRS Virtual Library. NCJRS invites you to explore the breadth and scope of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection and services. With more than 220,000 collection documents and 60,000 online resources, including all known Office of Justice Programs works, it is one of the world’s largest criminal justice special collections.

We encourage your Feedback. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Virtual Library and Abstracts Database, how you access the collection, and any ways we can improve our services.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 199365   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Measuring Public Perceptions of Appropriate Prison Sentences, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): Mark A. Cohen ; Roland T. Rust ; Sara Steen
Corporate Author: Vanderbilt University
United States of America
Date Published: 10/2002
Page Count: 118
  Annotation: This document is the final report for a study designed to elicit information about the public’s preferences regarding sentencing and parole of criminal offenders.
Abstract: It is important for policymakers to understand how the public views the appropriateness of current criminal justice policy, especially concerning the appropriateness of incarceration, length of sentence, and parole decisions. This research project tested new methodologies designed to elicit information about the public’s preferences regarding sentencing and parole of criminal offenders. The authors explained that their study relies heavily on the well-established method used by Wolfgang, et al. of sampling a portion of the U.S. population and asking them to respond to a series of crime vignettes. The goal of such a method is to gauge public perception of the seriousness of different crimes. In this case, however, the authors used a constrained-choice model designed to force the respondent to first, choose which of a series of crimes is more serious, and second, how much they would be willing to pay to reduce crime in their community. Other important aspects of this study included: (1) the focus on crimes normally encountered by local criminal justice agencies; (2) the focus on the parole decision in a constrained-choice model; and (3) the incorporation of explicit tradeoffs of various crimes and sentences to better gauge public preferences. The authors also employed two new methodologies designed to gain information on the public’s willingness to pay for crime prevention and control policies. A nationally representative survey of 1,300 U.S. adults found that, with two exceptions, the public largely agreed with current sentencing decisions concerning incarceration and length of sentence. The authors found strong support for spending more money to further reduce crimes, although most preferred that the money go toward prevention programs and more police officers rather than more prisons. Finally, the authors elicited information about willingness to pay for crime reduction and found that most respondents were willing to pay between $75 and $150 per year for prevention programs that would reduce local crime rates by 10 percent. In conclusion, the authors note that while this study was largely undertaken to test new methodologies, their findings are relevant for policymakers who use seriousness-of-crime surveys to decide future criminal justice and police policies. Tables, references, appendix
Main Term(s): Research methods ; Citizen reactions to crime
Index Term(s): Crime seriousness measures ; Crime control policies ; Public Opinion of Crime ; Criminal justice system policy ; Societal reactions to crime ; NIJ grant-related documents
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 1999-CE-VX-0001
Sale Source: Vanderbilt University
21st Avenue, Sourth
Nashville, TN 37203
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: See NCJ-1993654 for the Executive Summary
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.