skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 201945     Find in a Library
Title: Increasing Victim Safety and System Accountability: Evaluating a Collaborative Intervention Between Health Care and Criminal Justice, Final Technical Report
Corporate Author: Texas Women's University
College of Nursing
United States of America
Date Published: 03/2003
Page Count: 60
Grant Number: 2000-WT-VX-0020
Document: PDF 
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Technical)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This document is a final technical report of a study on increasing domestic violence victim safety and system accountability based on a collaboration of health care and criminal justice agencies.
Abstract: The objective for this study was more safety-seeking behaviors, lower experienced violence, higher physical and emotional functioning, and less employment harassment among women that qualify for a protection order and receive the Advocacy-Case Management intervention as compared to women that do not receive the intervention. The two theories guiding the research were Walker’s three-phase cycle theory of violence and Curnow’s open window phase of help-seeking and reality behaviors. A two-group experimental design with an intervention using random assignment to control group (usual District Attorney procedures) or experimental group (Advocacy Case Management Intervention), and repeated measures at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months was used. The sample consisted of all women, 18 years or older, applying and qualifying for a protection order against a sexual intimate. The results show that adoption of safety behaviors significantly increased over time for women in the intervention group. The effect of the intervention was large at 3 months, remained substantial at 6 months, and then stabilized and remained consistent at 12 and 18 months. Slightly more than half of the women in the study completed the process of applying for and receiving a protection order. But the intervention group that received the advocacy case-management and assistance with their protection order processing received no more protection orders and in no shorter time than the control that received standard processing. There were significant differences in relationship status at intake between the women that subsequently received or dropped the protection order. 75 references
Main Term(s): Interagency cooperation ; Battered women programs
Index Term(s): Family crisis ; Victim services ; Battered wives ; Abused women ; Restraining orders ; Domestic assault prevention
Note: See NCJ-201944 for the executive summary.
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=201945

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.