skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 209731   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment Validation Study, Final Report
Author(s): Jacquelyn C. Campbell Ph.D. ; Chris O'Sullivan Ph.D. ; Janice Roehl Ph.D. ; Daniel Webster Sc.D.
Corporate Author: Johns Hopkins University
United States of America

Safe Horizon
United States of America
Project Director: Patricia Mahoney ; Melissa White ; Kristen Guertin ; Kate Semple
Date Published: 03/2005
Page Count: 92
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2000-WT-VX-0011
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The major goal of this multisite field test was to assess the predictive accuracy of two instruments--the Domestic Violence Screening Instrument (DVSI) and the Kingston Screening Instrument for Domestic Violence (K-SID)--that assess the risk of repeat violence in intimate relationships, as well as one instrument (the Danger Assessment) and one Threat Assessment Method (DV-MOSAIC) that estimate lethal or near-lethal risk in violent intimate partner relationships.
Abstract: Four New York City sites and two Los Angeles sites were selected for testing the instruments. A total of 1,307 domestic-violence victims were involved in baseline interviews. Follow-up interviews were begun in December 2002 and ended in early January 2004. Although follow-up phone contacts began 6 months after baseline interviews, the length of the follow-up periods varied among the sample for various reasons. Retention rates varied from site to site, ranging from a low of 33 percent to a high of 69 percent. Overall, of the 1,307 enrollees at baseline, follow-up interviews were completed with 782 (60 percent). At Time 1, 82 percent of the women had experienced severe abuse, with all but 6 percent having been physically assaulted by their partner or ex-partner. Approximately one-third had been re-assaulted by the end of the follow-up period (a maximum of 2 years). Repeat assaults continued to be severe, with 11 percent having experienced a potentially lethal attack. None of the instruments or method was impressive in predicting reassault. By most analytical strategies, the Danger Assessment had the strongest psychometric properties, including the predictive statistics. The DVSI and DV-MOSAIC also had significant associations with re-assaults. The K-SID was the weakest of the instruments; however, it did well in predicting re-arrests with the use of criminal justice data. Women's perception of risk did better than the other assessment methods. Extensive tables and 151 references
Main Term(s): Victims of violence
Index Term(s): Testing and measurement ; Domestic assault ; Dangerousness ; Risk management ; Recidivism prediction ; Multiple victimization ; Victimization risk ; NIJ final report ; Violence prediction ; New York ; California
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=209731

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.