skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 216548     Find in a Library
Title: Reevaluating the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Model and Data Uncertainty
Author(s): Ethan Cohen-Cole ; Steven Durlauf ; Jeffrey Fagan ; Daniel Nagin
Date Published: 12/2006
Page Count: 38
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2005-IJ-CX-0020
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper presents and applies a methodology--"model averaging," which uses weighted averages of a wide set of possible models--that integrates the various statistical studies of the deterrent effects of capital punishment into a single coherent analysis.
Abstract: The application of this methodology found little evidence of a deterrent effect for capital punishment. Statistical analyses that claim a deterrent effect for capital punishment are apparently based on an inadvertent selection of individual, and highly unlikely, models. Using the methodology of "model averaging," the authors were unable to identify a reasonably sized model space that produced even a single significant negative coefficient on one of the three deterrence variables. This report shows model-averaged coefficients that fail to support the link between deterrence and capital punishment. These are the synthesis of thousands of potential specifications. Existing research on the deterrent effect of capital punishment comes to differing conclusions based upon one or more underlying assumptions that call into question the ability of any single model to explain the impact of capital punishment laws. Such dependence on the specifics of research design--from data cleaning, to aggregation, to model choice--is the basis for using averaging techniques. Since relatively minor variations in model or variable choice can lead to significant changes in conclusions, the inclusion of the information content of all the models lends itself to conclusions upon which policymakers can be more confident. "Model averaging" achieves this. A 50-item bibliography, extensive tables and figures, and appended codebook
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Statistical analysis ; Capital punishment ; Deterrence ; Deterrence effectiveness ; Research design models ; NIJ final report
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=238166

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.