skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 229196   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Evaluating the Use of Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) Technology to Prevent and Investigate Sexual Assaults in a Correctional Setting
Author(s): Nancy La Vigne ; Robin Halberstadt ; Barbara Parthasarathy
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America
Date Published: 10/2009
Page Count: 87
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2007-RP-BX-0001
Sale Source: The Urban Institute
2100 M Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This evaluation examined whether Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) technology deterred inmates from engaging in prohibited behaviors such as sexual assault and violence at the Northeast Pre-Release Center (NEPRC) in Cleveland, OH.
Abstract: Two serious problems with RFID implementation and use at NEPRC were identified by the process component of the evaluation. First, the technology was not fully implemented due to limited resources. This restricted its ability to confirm facility-wide head counts, which essentially rendered the technology nothing more than a perimeter control device. The limited implementation of RFID technology at NEPRC did not increase staff's ability to detect misconduct, increase inmates' risk of detection for misconduct, or deter prohibited behaviors. Second, NEPRC experienced technical problems that resulted in the interruption of RFID service for weeks, forcing the evaluation team to adopt a less desirable two-phased impact evaluation approach. Thus, the evaluation was unable to determine the degree to which RFID technology, when implemented to its full capacity, deters inmates from prohibited behaviors. Still, the evaluation yielded important lessons for corrections practitioners who are considering investing in this technology. They should ensure that they have sufficient resources to support the full implementation of all capabilities of the RFID system, be able to fund continuous technical support, and effectively train staff in the use of the technology. As envisioned for use in correctional facilities, RFID transmitter chips can communicate to staff the locations and movements of inmates within the prison. It can be programmed to issue alerts when inmates are out of place, in prohibited locations, or are in proximity to individuals with whom they have conflict. In addition, RFID historical records can be used to investigate allegations of inmate misconduct. The evaluation methodology involved a three-pronged data-collection and analysis strategy that is described in this report. 3 tables, 6 figures, 49 references, and appended evaluation protocols and "evaluability" assessment
Main Term(s): Corrections management
Index Term(s): Electronic surveillance ; Violent inmates ; Technology transfer ; Inmate personal security ; Science and Technology ; Prisoner sexual assault ; Electronic monitoring of offenders ; Inmate monitoring ; Inmate misconduct ; NIJ final report
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=251223

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.