skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 231977   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Role and Impact of Forensic Evidence in the Criminal Justice Process
Author(s): Joseph Peterson ; Ira Sommers ; Deborah Baskin ; Donald Johnson
Date Published: 09/2010
Page Count: 151
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2006-DN-BX-0094
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Dataset: DATASET 1  DATASET 2
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The reported study estimated the percentage of crime scenes from which one or more types of forensic evidence is collected; described and cataloged the kinds of forensic evidence collected at crime scenes; tracked the use and attrition of forensic evidence in the criminal justice system from crime scenes through laboratory analysis, and then through subsequent criminal justice processes; and identified which forms of forensic evidence contributed most often (relative to their availability at a crime scene) to successful case outcomes.
Abstract: For the five jurisdictions analyzed, the study found that the collection of forensic evidence from crime scenes and victims was extensive in homicides and, to a lesser extent, rapes; it was significantly more limited for assaults, burglaries, and robberies. With the exception of homicides, few of the reported offenses involved forensic evidence that was submitted to crime laboratories. Such submissions were 89 percent for homicides; 32 percent for rapes; and under 15 percent for assaults, burglaries, and robberies. Also, the overall percentage was low for reported offenses that had physical evidence examined in crime labs, with the exception of homicides (81 percent); it was less than 20 percent for rape cases and less than 10 percent for assaults, burglaries, and robberies. Of evidence submitted to labs, however, rates of examination exceeded 70 percent, with the exception of rape cases (58 percent). These findings suggest that criminal justice officials screen much of the forensic evidence in determining which evidence will be sent to crime labs for analysis, giving them significant discretion in determining evidence-examination priorities and practices. The most frequently collected, submitted, and examined types of evidence were fingerprints, firearms, and biological material (blood and semen). DNA evidence was concentrated in homicide cases and, to a lesser extent, rape cases. Specific follow-up research is recommended. 10 figures, 24 tables, 28 references, and appended data on unique/associative evidence and the increase in DNA analysis
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Assault and battery ; Burglary ; Evidence collection ; Fingerprints ; Robbery ; Trace evidence ; Police discretion ; Comparative analysis ; Rape investigations ; Forensics/Forensic Sciences ; Investigative techniques ; Homicide investigations ; DNA fingerprinting ; NIJ final report
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=254056

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.