skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 239971   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Legitimacy, Fear and Collective Efficacy in Crime Hot Spots: Assessing the Impacts of Broken Windows Policing Strategies on Citizen Attitudes
Author(s): David Weisburd ; Joshua C. Hinkle ; Christine Famega ; Justin Ready
Date Published: 11/2010
Page Count: 209
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2007-IJ-CX-0047
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the impacts of “broken windows” policing at crime “hot spots” on the public’s fear of crime, ratings of police legitimacy, and reports of collective efficacy among residents of targeted “hot spots.”
Abstract: The “broken windows” thesis (Wilson & Kelling, 1982) suggests that the benefit of eliminating visual signs of social disorder and neglect in “hot spot” areas (areas where particular types of crime are concentrated) is that residents will over time feel safer and be empowered to exercise informal social controls that control disorderly and criminal behavior at “hot spots.” In order to test this theory, this study examined the impact of a 6-month “broken windows” policing style, which involved a crackdown on disorder in the targeted areas. The objective of these efforts was to achieve an extra 3 hours per week of police presence in each of 55 targeted street segments. This goal was met over the majority of the study period. Participating officers were instructed to intervene in any instances of physical or social disorder in target areas; they were given broad discretion in deciding how to address disorder problems. A post-intervention survey was conducted among 489 residents and 347 businesses. The survey was conducted immediately following the police intervention, which covered January 2009 through April 2009. The survey preceding the intervention was compared with the post-intervention survey. Each survey measured fear of crime/perceived risk of victimization, police legitimacy, collective efficacy, and perceived social and physical disorder. The findings do not support the belief that “broken windows” policing at “hot spots” will significantly reduce levels of feat of crime among people who live on the targeted streets. Neither was there an improvement among residents regarding police legitimacy, but neither did it undermine views of police. There was no impact on collective efficacy (improved community involvement in crime prevention). Extensive tables and figures and approximately 100 references
Main Term(s): Police effectiveness
Index Term(s): Crime Control Programs ; Police community relations ; Environmental quality ; Police resource allocation ; Geographic distribution of crime ; Fear of crime ; Environmental influences ; Public Opinion of the Police ; Crime control policies ; NIJ final report
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=262044

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.