skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 243319   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Significance of Association in Tool Mark Characterization
Author(s): L. S. Chumbley ; M. Morris
Date Published: 08/2013
Page Count: 54
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2009-DN-R-119
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Building on the authors’ recent study of tool marks that developed a computer algorithm able to reliably separate matching tool marks from those that do not match, the current report provides additional statistical information that increases the relevance of the measurements obtained.
Abstract: This was done by first extending the previously developed statistical methodology to allow for self-calibration in controlling rates of false non-matches and then empirically validating the methodology developed by performing experiments that used a different type of tool mark. The authors’ previous work focused on the use of the Mann-Whitney U-statistic as an index for assessing the similarity of toolmarks. Although it has been empirically shown to be useful in sorting mark-pairs made by the same tool from mark-pairs made with different tools, it is also influenced by many other aspects of the tool mark structure, such that a single value cannot be used as objective evidence for or against a match. The current work overcame this difficulty by using multiple test marks made in the laboratory in a “self-calibrated” analysis. Comparison values between lab marks that are known to match form the basis for comparisons between lab marks and evidence marks. This eliminates the need for “universal” critical values (i.e., single sets of constant references value such as those found in commonly used statistical tables) for the comparison index. A formal statistical analysis based on likelihood functions has been developed to allow for control of false non-match calls. The methodology developed was empirically validated by performing experiments that used a different type of tool mark. Successful validation of the methodology has produced a wide range of possible future applications for the developed statistical algorithm that could revolutionize comparative tool mark analysis. 25 figures, 4 tables, 26 references, and listings in which research findings have been disseminated
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Mathematical models ; Toolmark identification ; Comparative analysis ; Forensics/Forensic Sciences ; Investigative techniques ; NIJ final report
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=265396

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.