skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 243836     Find in a Library
Title: Evaluability Assessments of the Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) Model, Site Report: COSA Lancaster
Author(s): Ian A. Elliott, Ph.D. ; Gary Zajac, Ph.D. ; Courtney A. Meyer, M.A.
Date Published: 07/2013
Page Count: 26
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2012-IJ-CX-0008
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Grants and Funding
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study identified issues that should be considered in an evaluation design for Lancaster’s (Pennsylvania) Circles of Support and Accountability, a restorative justice-based community reentry program for high-risk sex offenders with little or no pro-social community support.
Abstract: Lancaster’s COSA (“COSA Lancaster”) was part of a five-site study of COSA programs in the United States that assessed their readiness for a rigorous evaluation. This assessment concludes that COSA Lancaster is not operating at sufficient capacity to justify investment in a rigorous evaluation; however, it has a strong model in place with the potential for growth, provided the program achieves a sufficient level of financial and operational stability. It is noteworthy that the Center for Community Peacemaking (CCP), which manages COSA Lancaster, has established a COSA program in a region the CCP describes as both politically and religiously conservative. Plans for development include more effective administration, better documentation of program operation, improvements in recruiting volunteer staff, and additional fundraising. The assessment identified some deviations from the intended COSA model, such as flexibility in the “core member” selection criteria. Staff workload was also identified as problematic, as the program director was required to assume a dual role as circle coordinator while being part-time. Further development of relationships with the criminal justice system is also required. The state of data collection, management, and storage is of concern, and this must be improved in order to provide data sufficient for an evaluation. Still, COSA Lancaster has established its first Circles and has been successful in maintaining them. 2 figures and 16 references
Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
Index Term(s): Program evaluation ; Volunteer programs ; Social conditions ; Socially challenged ; Sex offenders ; Program implementation ; Social reintegration ; Post-release programs ; Corrections volunteers ; Sex offender treatment ; NIJ final report ; Pennsylvania ; Reentry ; Restorative Justice
Note: For the cross-site report, see NCJ-243832; for other site reports, see NCJ-243833-35 and NCJ-243837.
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=265913

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.