he
purpose of this project was to gain meaningful input from judges and
crime victims about the following:
In addition, the project provided a demonstration
of the value of structured, honest, and meaningful dialogue among juvenile
court judges, crime victims, and community members. As a result of the
project, such structured dialogue is already being replicated in followup
focus groups in several jurisdictions.
The project's strategy was to build upon existing state and local
support for restorative justice initiatives and victim empowerment
through guided focus group discussions. Local court jurisdictions
in four participating states were chosen because the state had recently
adopted, or was in the process of developing, new victims' rights
legislation relevant to victims of juvenile offenders, and the state
had recently adopted new policies and/or statutes based upon the balanced
approach and restorative justice. The four focus group sites were
Harrisburg, PA, St. Paul, MN, West Palm Beach, FL, and Sacramento,
CA.
Victim participants in 1 state were selected from a random pool
derived from a list of 30 cases identified by the court. Since this
approach was not viable in the remaining three states, victim advocates
generated a list of potential participants. The 18 victim participants
selected included 9 victims of violent crimes and 9 victims of property
crimes. Judge participants were identified through lists provided
by judicial training organizations in each regional circuit. A total
of 20 judges participated in the 4 focus groups. Diversity of gender,
age, ethnicity, and political philosophy was achieved in both the
victim and judge groups.
Each forum began with an overview of the project goals, a brief
review of state and national changes in victims' rights legislation
affecting juvenile courts, and a short presentation of restorative
justice principles and practices. The protocol for each focus group
process included the following:
Two detailed discussion guides containing the questions were developed
by the project staff. Judges, victims, and victim advocates were divided
into separate groups and asked identical questions. Opportunities
were provided for the groups to share ideas with the entire group
and for discussion among the combined group of victims, victim advocates,
and judges. Individual worksheets asked participants to rank the importance
of the barriers to victim involvement and application of restorative
justice practices. This stimulated the expression of opinions, even
among the less outgoing participants.
|