While a number of states have recently
passed legislation to increase the rights of victims in juvenile courts,
there is still a huge discrepancy between victims' rights in juvenile
courts and adult courts. The great majority of victims of juvenile
offenders feel excluded from the workings of the juvenile court. After
their victimization, they typically learn little about what happens
with their case. This can magnify their sense of powerlessness and
fear of revictimization. In an effort to understand why this exclusion
occurs and how it can be corrected, the Office for Victims of Crime
(OVC) funded a project that conducted four focus groups of juvenile
court judges and victims of juvenile offenders. Their activities and
findings were documented for this publication, Victims, Judges,
and Juvenile Court Reform Through Restorative Justice.
OVC believes that all victims, regardless of the age of their
offenders, should be afforded basic rights and services by the courts,
including notification of key events in their case, information
about the offender's status, court-ordered restitution and protection,
and referrals to victim assistance services and compensation. Additionally,
it is critically important for all victims to be treated with dignity
and respect.
The focus groups afforded crime victims and juvenile court judges
an opportunity to exchange experiences and views on victim issues
in juvenile court. Using restorative justice principles as a framework
for developing a fairer distribution of rights and responsibilities,
the victims and judges explored a range of actions and strategies
to improve the responses toward crime victims by courts and the
entire juvenile justice system.
Focus group participants expressed appreciation for the helpful
dialogue afforded by the focus group format. OVC hopes to make this
format available to other jurisdictions so they, too, can conduct
expanded and continuous dialogue among crime victims, their advocates,
the community, and juvenile justice professionals. Many participants
planned to use this format on a continuing basis at the local level.
OVC anticipates that juvenile court personnel, juvenile probation
agencies, state Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) victim assistance administrators,
and victim service organizations will all find this publication
helpful as it gathers and makes available to the field the perceptions
of victims of the juvenile justice system and the perceptions of
juvenile court judges regarding the roles and rights of victims
in the juvenile justice system. We at OVC encourage an ongoing dialogue
that can only improve the treatment of crime victims by the juvenile
courts.
|
|
Victims, Judges, and
Juvenile Court Reform Through Restorative Justice
Introduction
Project Objectives
Background
Balancing Client Needs:
Restorative Juvenile Justice
Project Purpose and
Methodology
Focus Group Findings
Victims as Involved
Stakeholders
The Viability
of Restorative Justice Practices
Meeting Victims'
Needs: Role of the Juvenile Court and Justice System
Summary and Conclusion
For Further Information
Bibliography
Additional Resources
The Restorative Justice
and Mediation Collection
PDF
and ASCII Files
Back to Publications
This document was prepared by
the Community Justice Institute at Florida Atlantic University
under grant number 97-VF-GX-K013, awarded by the Office for
Victims of Crime, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department
of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations
expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent the official position or policies of the
U.S. Department of Justice.
The Office for Victims of Crime is a component of the Office
of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice
Assistance, Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute
of Justice, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention.
|
|
Acknowledgments
OVC gratefully acknowledges the Community
Justice Institute at Florida Atlantic University for its fine
efforts in managing this project. OVC also gratefully acknowledges
the project's principal investigators and writers: Gordon Bazemore,
Ph.D., Principal Investigator, College of Urban and Public Affairs;
Anne Seymour, Co-principal Investigator, Victim Advocate; Susan
Day, Ph.D., Project Manager; and Ted Rubin, Senior Research
Associate. |
|
|